What’s Wrong with “Spirituality”?

By Frederica Mathewes-Greene

I don’t like the category “spirituality.” It sounds so external. It sounds so optional. It isn’t a concept I find in the first millennium, or anywhere in Eastern Christianity. As far as I can tell, what people today mean by “spirituality” is what St. Paul meant by “life in Christ.”

This is a transformation that every Christian is supposed to be experiencing, because we are all “partakers of the divine nature” (2 Peter 1:4). As we partake of the life of Christ and discipline ourselves, seeking to assimilate that life, it affects both our souls and bodies. His light spreads within us like fire spreading through a lump of coal, and so we become Christ-bearers to the world. This is such an essential, foundational element of life in Christ that to extract it and label it seems to deaden it.

Early Christians did not talk about “spirituality,” much less varieties of spirituality, appropriate to this or that kind of personality, or ethnic background, or gender. Not only is that unhelpful, I don’t think it’s even possible to set up such divisions. Each one of us is participating in the light of the One Christ, so in one sense “spirituality” is exactly the same for everyone, because Christ is one. But each one of us is the only human being God ever made who is exactly us, so we will radiate that light back out again just a bit differently than any other saint.

So although the unity of Christ means there is only one possible “spirituality,” in another sense there are as many different “spiritualities” as the billions of people who live and who have lived. But an in-between that imagines that there are different styles appropriate to this or that sub-group, speaks of nothing so much as our culture’s reflexive love of shopping.

The thing about contemporary “spirituality” that annoys me the most is its capacity for narcissism. Focusing on spirituality instead of on the Lord makes you stop halfway down the hallway and think about yourself. That obviously delays your progress. It can be a temptation to consumerism – “Gee, centering prayer didn’t work, I think I’ll try Ignatian meditation.” And it can be a temptation to self-adornment, by suggesting that being spiritual makes you superior to other people, makes you more “interesting” or “deep.” What appears to be very intentional involvement with spiritual things, can actually be simply the taking up a new beauty regimen.

We can say, as in Christ’s parable of the wheat and tares, “An enemy has done this.” It is a strategy of the Evil One to take a good impulse and twist it backward into self-regard.

The term “spirituality” is troublesome because it reifies something that ought to go unnoticed. When you start taking an exaggerated interest in your breathing is when your breathing starts going wrong. Our sole focus should be on the compelling beauty of our Lord, and what moves us forward is only our desire for him. So my advice is: don’t seek an improved spirituality, or even a better prayer life. Just seek the Lord Jesus Christ, and keep your eyes on him.

Originally published in “Gifted For Leadership,” January 2007.


Tagged as: ,

Comments

  • Paul Maurice Martin said:

    The word “spirituality” is needed because there are many good and profoundly wise human beings on the planet who don’t happen to be Christian.

    “Spiritual” is also a good concept because there are plenty of Christians, who, as with all large groups of human beings, behave in ways that are not good or wise. So you can call yourself a Christian but be completely ensnared by love of money, sex, drugs etc.

    And you can be non Christian and not be ensnared - “spiritual” in other words.

  • Louise Lewis said:

    Very interesting perceptions…Fortunately, I cannot relate to spirituality being external or optional. For me, quite the opposite. But in case you know people to whom these labels apply, your wonderful food-for-thought words/advice might open their minds to your views.

    “One possible spirituality”…I recently heard an interesting analogy. Spirituality is like an ocean…deep, vast, mysterious. There is only one (say Pacific Ocean) and many people flock to it. Yet each person has a different way of getting to the ocean…a different reason for wanting to be at the ocean…and still a different manner to navigate and explore it. All the differences exist, yet still one ocean. Is this a case for viva la difference?

    thank you for a great post!

    take care,
    Louise Lewis, author
    No Experts Needed: The Meaning of Life According to You!
    Gift copy at: http://www.noexpertsneeded.com

Trackbacks

There are no trackbacks